|Home | Downloads | Screenshots | Forums | Source code | RSS | Donate|
|Register | Log in|
melonDS aims at providing fast and accurate Nintendo DS emulation. While it is still a work in progress, it has a pretty solid set of features:
• Nearly complete core (CPU, video, audio, ...)
• JIT recompiler for fast emulation
• OpenGL renderer, 3D upscaling
• RTC, microphone, lid close/open
• Joystick support
• Various display position/sizing/rotation modes
• (WIP) Wifi: local multiplayer, online connectivity
• (WIP) DSi emulation
• (WIP) GBA slot add-ons
• and more are planned!
If you're running into trouble: Howto/FAQ
Pride month and DMA timings
Jun 7th 2021, by Arisotura
Well, happy Pride month, or whatever, dunno how to put it. As a trans girl of some flavor, I just want to reiterate support to the LGBTI+ community. I'm also not the only LGBTI+ member of the melonDS team, btw.
Now, let's talk about something more technical (so this post is not just a 'political statement' :P ).
You might have noticed the timing17 branch. So what, another timing branch. Arisotura just loves these. Or something.
It's going to be some general timing renovation, depending on how far my motivation will take me. I started the work with DMA timings, figuring it would just be matter of taking into account that sequential timings only work when the address is incrementing linearly... well, it's hairier than that.
This is based on tests done at like 04:00, and this is the DS, so take this with a rock of salt.
Most memory regions in the DS have such timing characteristics that sequential accesses make no difference, atleast from the standpoint of DMA. The ARM9 and its 3-cycle penalty when using the bus are another story.
However, there are a couple regions that have different rules.
Main RAM (0x02000000)
... read more
|10 comments (last by Rekrat) | Post a comment|
Well, guess we owe you another release soon
May 19th 2021, by Arisotura
A quick 0.9.3 release would be welcome, especially to fix the stupid bugs that appeared in 0.9.2.
Like how touchscreen input will wrap around instead of properly clamping like it's always done. This is a good reminder to us to always test all features, even those that are granted for working. They work... until somebody introduces broken code that breaks them. It's not like this hasn't happened in the past, either, so we should do more quality control.
Sorry about this.
I haven't been doing a whole lot of melonDS coding lately either. I began researching some issues, began working on timing test suites, then veered to MPU stuff, and, well...
There are other things going on in real life, which doesn't help. I can't really focus on more than one big thing at once. There are a few going on right now: trying to find a bigger apartment to move in with friends, another housing-related thing I can't really post details about, and dealing with the obnoxious little pricks who live right next to my apartment and like partying all the damn time. Seriously they look like kids who got a fancypants sound system for Christmas or something.
Once these things have settled I will hopefully be able to work more on melonDS.
The first test suites I was making were for DMA timings. I'd need to polish them and add more test cases to make it good. Although really, the timings mostly boil down to a set of rules, some of which I have yet to implement into melonDS: for example, the maximum length of a sequential read/write burst is 118 units, and (figures) sequential bursts only work when the address is incrementing. The main issue I face is implementing the rules in an elegant and efficient way.
This doesn't even get into the fun part of CPU timings. You get the code fetch cycles, data access cycles, and other internal/etc cycles, which may interact and overlap in all sorts of fancy ways.
I want to address the timing issues once and for all, and I feel it's pointless to attempt things like full cache emulation if our underlying timing model is wrong.
|15 comments (last by ToonLink22) | Post a comment|
Introducing the compute renderer
May 1st 2021, by Generic aka RSDuck
To make things short, I've been working on porting melonDS's software rasteriser to run on the GPU via compute shaders. So how is this different to melonDS's existing OpenGL renderer? The OpenGL renderer uses builtin functionality of your GPU to draw triangles. This is of course fast, since it uses hardware specifically made for this, but it has the downside that some things can't be controlled by us, so the behaviour of the DS can't be replicated completely faithfully. On the otherhand this only utilises the programmable parts of the GPU (which means we have full control over them), so it's like the software rasteriser, only it utilises the parallel computing power of GPUs. Ideally it should be eable to be just as accurate as the software rasetriser is.
Why are we doing this in the first place?
You might have already heard of parallel-rdp from Themaister which provides a very accurate emulation of the RDP (i.e. that part of the N64 which in the end draws the triangles) running on the GPU. It has been a great inspiration for this project (which means where possible it's basically a clone). So thanks to Themaister for all the ideas and also for answering my questions!
Currently the main part of the work is done (it's already somewhat playable with a lot of games), so it's easier to list what's still missing:
|24 comments (last by Guest) | Post a comment|
melonDS 0.9.2 is out!
Apr 26th 2021, by Arisotura
This release brings some welcome changes.
Namely, improved Mac support: there have been fixes to the JIT, but also to the interface, so things should work more smoothly under macOS.
melonDS also supports loading ROMs from the most common archive formats, now, which means users with large ROM sets should have it easier.
We also have a new menu listing the ROMs you have opened recently, making it quicker to open them again.
We got new fancy screen modes courtesy Generic. These make it possible to use 16:9 hacks along with melonDS, among other fun things. Speaking of renderers, he also went and fixed a whole bunch of OpenGL issues.
The cart interface refactor was finished in time for this release, and with it, support for NAND save memory. WarioWare DIY and Jam with the Band are now able to save correctly under melonDS.
And, as usual, there are a bunch of other misc changes, which you can find about in the changelog or commit history.
melonDS 0.9.2, Windows 64-bit
melonDS 0.9.2, Linux 64-bit
melonDS 0.9.2, Linux ARM64
melonDS 0.9.2, MacOS 64-bit
melonDS 0.9.2, MacOS ARM64
melonDS 0.9.2, MacOS universal
|26 comments (last by ANONIMO) | Post a comment|
Change to the save file handling
Apr 15th 2021, by Arisotura
I continued the work on the cart_refactor branch, and the structure itself is nearly done (I'll still need to take care of savestates). And, in a typical burst of ADHD-coding, I went and implemented support for NAND save memory, as used by WarioWare DIY and Jam with the Band.
This is when I realized that the current way melonDS handles save files was going to be problematic. Basically, if a save file already exists, melonDS will determine the save memory type from that file's size, instead of using its built-in game list. This was designed in the old days, where we had some wonky heuristics instead of the game list -- the basic idea was that if melonDS failed to determine the correct save memory type, you could provide a known good save file and it would work, bypassing the problem.
Obviously, this is also a double-edged sword. If you happen to have a save file that isn't the correct size, melonDS will pick the wrong save memory type, potentially breaking things. In the end, this strategy now seems to cause more problems than it solves, especially since we have the game list.
The NAND thing was the final nail in the coffin of this strategy. It had been assumed, from some source I don't recall, that the save memory size for NAND was 32MB, and this was nice, because each possible save memory size had only one associated type, no confusion. However, the hardware tests I did showed that the NAND save memory is actually 8MB, and this conflicts with one of the possible FLASH sizes.
(EDIT- I was corrected by another tester. The save memory for WarioWare DIY is 16MB, not 8MB.)
So I ripped the old thing out, and instead made it always rely on the game list to determine the save memory type, regardless of the save file's size. As a bonus, save files that are too big will work too, melonDS will just ignore the extra contents. Which means that, for example, DeSmuME's .dsv files could be used as-is, by just changing the extension to .sav.
If you believe this is going to be a major disadvantage, or see any issue with this, I encourage you to reply to this post.
|8 comments (last by Anon) | Post a comment|
Redesigning the cart interface
Apr 13th 2021, by Arisotura
The kind of change that doesn't immediately mean a lot for end users, but means a lot for us coders (and ultimately means something for end users, too).
Anyway, this tends to show why it's good to think forward when designing your code. That being said, I need to find a balance with this. I tend to either think forward too much and end up paralyzed by questions that don't mean much, or just write code as it comes to my mind.
The cart interface in melonDS was originally built without much consideration for future. If you're wondering, the cart interface is the part of the emulator that lets emulated software access the emulated cartridge, because on the DS the cart isn't just directly mapped to CPU address space like on older consoles. Instead, there are a bunch of commands you can send to the cart to retrieve various parts of the contents, and different encryption protocols securing it up.
As melonDS became capable enough to run commercial software, emulating the cart interface was a must. So NDSCart.cpp was born. The main component is the NDSCart namespace, which originally emulated the cart interface hardware (basically the DS side) and command responses for a generic cart. There is also NDSCart_SRAM, which emulates the on-cart SPI save memory. A tad hacky, but for most games, it did the job.
But, that's the thing, not all DS carts are the same!
There were already some exceptions for homebrew ROMs, which might want to use the cart interface and, depending how old they are, need a more lax implementation of the generic cart protocol. Namely, retail carts don't let you read addresses lower than 0x8000 via the generic data read command (0xB7), because that region contains the ROM header (read via a different command), the Key1 encryption data and the secure area. However, old homebrew ROMs don't have any of that (save for the oldstyle DS header), and have their ARM9 binary start at 0x200. Newer homebrew ROMs are closer to the layout of a retail cart, mostly due to the added DSi support (the DSi header is 0x1000 bytes instead of 0x200), but, since not everybody is here to rebuild their ROMs, we still need to support the older ROMs.
Homebrew aside, there are also different types of retail carts.
A prime example is Pokémon games. The carts are fitted with a IR transceiver, which is accessed via the save-memory SPI bus. In practice, the first byte of a SPI transfer is a command for the IR transceiver. For now, we know that command 0x08 is some ping command that should reply 0xAA, and command 0x00 is the pass-through command, where any further bytes are forwarded to the save memory. Emulating this is required for Pokémon games to be playable at all. In melonDS, these commands were added to the generic save-memory code. A bit of a hack, since this means these would be 'functional' in any game instead of just Pokémon games, but it did the trick.
But there's more. Games like WarioWare DIY, or Jam with the Band, don't even use the save-memory SPI bus. They have save memory, but it's a NAND memory that is accessed via the same bus as the ROM itself, through a set of specific commands.
... read more
|5 comments (last by WaluigiWare64) | Post a comment|
Release 0.9.2 coming out soon
Apr 10th 2021, by Arisotura
As title says. Right now, the only thing holding us back is that we need to setup Azure CI for proper Mac builds. I have contacted the Azure service to get a CI grant, but they haven't gotten back to me yet.
We have some cool ideas, too, but these will be for further releases.
Also, in somewhat related news, I'm starting to work on another idea. It's not related to melonDS, but it's related to the DS. For now, this is going to be a surprise, but those who have seen my Twitter lately might figure out what I'm up to. I will make a post once I've got a working prototype.
|9 comments (last by Arisotura) | Post a comment|
Mar 26th 2021, by Arisotura
This is the first time I write a blog post in a while, so I will try to keep this short.
First, what's new on my side?
I finished my hearing for the gender marker change thing. You know, so I can get a big fat F on my ID card. You prolly don't care a lot about my trans shenanigans but this means it's one thing out of my way, and we can now proceed to full-speed melonDSing (and hopefully not from a squat, but we're doing our best).
What else is there to say?
I can't keep my focus on one thing aaaaaa
I wanna maaaaaybe try to emulate some new fun shit in melonDS. like the pokémon keyboard thingy.
Wait, no, we need to make DSi emulation better. We can prolly add a file explorer thing, so you can put your DSiware into the thing easily, and idk what other cool features there were. Just suggest them below this post, pretty sure we can get this done together! melonDS will soar through union and friendship!
|41 comments (last by WaluigiWare64) | Post a comment|
Announcing ARM64 Mac (aka Apple Silicon Mac) support!
Mar 23rd 2021, by WaluigiWare64
First of all I'd like to thank StLouisCPhT for testing all the changes I made to try and get melonDS to work on ARM64 Macs. Without them, this wouldn't be possible as I don't have an ARM64 Mac (I don't have any Mac at all, however x86-64 macOS can be run in VMs). I would also like to thank Generic (aka RSDuck) for helping me out with JIT issues.
This started when a user named "Joel" (now StLouisCPhT) commented on my earlier post about compiling melonDS for ARM64 Macs. We took this to Private Messages on the forum board, and we were making progress slowly, but surely.
Here's a quick overview of the things that were needed for melonDS to run on ARM64 Macs (if you want to download the beta, scroll to the bottom of this post).
- The JIT compiler
The first issue was adding a way to get the Program Counter on ARM64 Macs. This was easy, all it needed was an ifdef to use "uc_mcontext->__ss.__pc".
The second issue was that Apple introduced W^X for JIT memory. This meant that we can only have Read-Write and Read-Execute permissions at one time, and this could be toggled by setting "pthread_jit_write_protect_np" to either true or false. This command had to be added to some location, otherwise the JIT would crash when trying to run something.
There was also another strange issue when some lines would cause the JIT to crash.
for (int i = 0; i < (JitMemMainSize + JitMemSecondarySize) / 4; i++)
*(((u32*)GetRWPtr()) + i) = brk_0;
Generic (aka RSDuck) told me that this was for adding breakpoint instructions to the JIT buffer. StLouisCPhT and I tried various things, but to no avail. However, once the changes were rebased on master, it seemed to work fine....
This wasn't affecting just ARM64 Macs, but I'll add it anyway.
We got a bug report on GitHub for the microphone not working on macOS. The solution? Add the "NSMicrophoneUsageDescription" key in the plist file, otherwise macOS would not ask for microphone access.
- Known Issues
* The fastmem checkbox is disabled: This is intentional, I cannot get fastmem to work on either x86-64 Macs or ARM64 Macs.
* Local Multiplayer doesn't work by running more than one instance on the same Mac: This needs to be investigated, although Local Multiplayer doesn't have the best support yet. It seems to work by running two copies of melonDS on different Macs though.
Well, that's all.
The beta builds for ARM64 include the libraries bundled, so you won't have to install them seperately.
melonDS 0.9.1 beta for ARM64 macOS
(For future reference, this build is based off commit 2c2e868.)
|4 comments (last by WaluigiWare64) | Post a comment|
Been silent lately...
Jan 31st 2021, by Arisotura
Winter depression and covid shito don't help, gladly we'll soon be getting more sunlight, so there's atleast that.
Anyway, you may have observed I haven't been doing a lot for melonDS lately... there are a couple reasons to that, besides that side project of fixing up vintage Macs and other shit.
I don't want to abandon melonDS, it's my project, but it's true that I have less interest into it at this point. Things like emulating new hardware features and hunting emulation bugs interest me much more than, say, UI shenanigans. As far as these things go, I tend to just accept work from other contributors, sometimes to the point of them becoming fulltime members of the 'melonDS team'. It's better this way, after all; as I say, an emulator project is like a tree: once you're done with the trunk, it branches off in a billion directions.
So, what can we attempt doing now?
I've been idly trying to figure out why DSiware will only load when installed on the NAND. So far, haven't gone very far with this, mostly because, well, my motivation tends to be an all-or-nothing thing. Either get the spark and find yourself coding until 5:00, or have a hard time doing anything at all. Also, working with the DSi firmware is a real pleasure: it's a huge spaghetti network of threads and callbacks and shit, making it a massive pain to track anything, even moreso when all you have is a bunch of ARM ASM.
From there, there would be two possibilities: a quick hack to bypass whatever check the DSi firmware uses, like we do for the region check, or actually installing the provided DSiware into the NAND. The latter implies dealing with an encryption layer and a FAT filesystem, which I can't wrap my head around. We'd need to get a good lil' FAT library, but then this would open more possibilities regarding DSi emulation.
Then there are the remaining popular-request items, and the big pile of issues.
For example, a looooot of the issues are with the OpenGL renderer. This is why I stand for emulating things accurately: you are far less likely to run into constant issues and get yourself caught into a game of whack-a-mole perpetually hacking around issues. While things like the OpenGL renderer are creative and cool, we have seen countless times that the DS GPU is a pile of quirks, and that emulating it correctly is only possible with somethings like our software renderer. We can keep coming up with creative solutions to try and fix OpenGL issues, but at some point there is only so much we can do when using a fundamentally inadequate tool.
An alternative may be unearthing my old 'shaderzorz' experiment: that was an attempt at a compute-shader rasterizer that worked similarly to that of the DS. Such a renderer, implemented either in compute shaders or in fragment shaders, may be able to get around the shortcomings of the current OpenGL renderer, and maybe also support higher-resolution rendering without too much of a performance penalty. Back then, I ended up ditching it in favor of a classical polygon-based renderer because I wasn't positive about the performance. However, the current renderer is far from optimal too, due to how rendering has to be done.
... read more
|37 comments (last by aNON) | Post a comment|